Monday, April 5, 2010
After watching this, I really feel ()#$*)(#*)$. That must be one of the most UNREASONABLE "rules" I have ever heard!
It is really true regarding the necessity to have a sweet for motion sickness cases. (Come on, I was a victim of motion sickness myself for half of my life!) And its really disheartening to see that SMRT are actually imposing fines on people just because of A SWEET, be it motion sickness or not.
Well, its really ridiculous (in my opinion) about their refusal and stubbornness to SEE and understand from a passenger's point of view.
So you'd rather want a vomiting and sick passenger? Well, there are ways to prevent this and sucking on sweets is one of the ways! I just couldn't understand why they wouldn't approve it especially when it concerns a person's health. (It doesn't even dirty the trains!)
Sheesh. *shakes head* That woman in the video got fined just because she has motion sickness, something that she couldn't help, too. Its like asking her and the rest of the victims like me to PAY for having poor healths. This is soooo undeserving.
Duh, whoever "invented" this sickening rule?
Catmelon -All rights reserved 2010.®